<-- This guyFNC QuErza! wrote:wait wait since when does someone with low activity on forums and 0 reports get accepted?

<-- This guyFNC QuErza! wrote:wait wait since when does someone with low activity on forums and 0 reports get accepted?
ayy lmao, you guys should hire flath for future admin meetings, so he can write up the notes.Flath wrote:Additionnal notes:
*We decided to let the whole jail team deal with applications when Flath went to vacation and when Joel was promoted to the admin team as we are not able to deal with basic day-to-day work for a whole month.
*Since the admin team is active, we decided to go back on our words regarding the co-leader member position making the relations between the admin team and the member team further than ever.
*Since the admin team is active, we decided to go back on our words regarding a team wide meeting.
*We decided to host member meetings on discord hitting two birds with one stone as it is easier to participate as an admin in those meetings & as we do no longer have to post the logs of the member meeting.
*We updated the way members were supposed to act ingame ban wise and have more transparency about what is happening in-game now.
*We decided that the amx_csay will be added for members.
*We decided not to make any change regarding the Freeday rule gameplay wise on Jailbreak when brought up in a member meeting as it would make things more confusing for everyone.
To sum up things, we now have a firmer control over the member team making them unable to work in proper conditions ingame as the load of things they now have to do has been increased exponentially compared to what was required before, making sure that the future requirements of members are as low as they can be while the work they can do is as high as they can deliver. We of course do not feel the need to offer more transparency regarding our own actions and meetings since it could impede our national sport which is the constant scoping we have on our precious playerbase.
To conclude, we are now able to keep our head high up in front of the community as a united team since most of the core-work required to run a community has been handed down to the member team.
LEFT:
* Flath has suprisingly left the member team.
The Admin team.
Thought you needed some real Additionnal notes, not just some map changes noone cares about. Most of the information i gave do not concern the tech admins who have done an amazing job over the past years. I would like to thank the admin team from one year ago for accepting me back into the team but i can't cope with the way nD is heading right now and some of the people in charge.
1: The JB moderators are moderators because they know the rules. Not everyone has access, only those who asked if they could take care of CT applications.Flath wrote:Additionnal notes:
*We decided to let the whole jail team deal with applications when Flath went to vacation and when Joel was promoted to the admin team as we are not able to deal with basic day-to-day work for a whole month.
*Since the admin team is active, we decided to go back on our words regarding the co-leader member position making the relations between the admin team and the member team further than ever.
*Since the admin team is active, we decided to go back on our words regarding a team wide meeting.
*We decided to host member meetings on discord hitting two birds with one stone as it is easier to participate as an admin in those meetings & as we do no longer have to post the logs of the member meeting.
*We updated the way members were supposed to act ingame ban wise and have more transparency about what is happening in-game now.
*We decided that the amx_csay will be added for members.
*We decided not to make any change regarding the Freeday rule gameplay wise on Jailbreak when brought up in a member meeting as it would make things more confusing for everyone.
I think the issue with Flath here is that it's built up and not only these decisions you have made.Gotouda Aki wrote:I don't understand your negativity upon these decisions. A lot of things both seem good and bad when you just look at the headline, but if you go deeper into them you start to understand why we make these decisions.
The admin team doesn't make decisions just to make things easier for themselves and make things harder for the moderators. We try to make things better and improve the community.
What I don't get, is why bump something that is new to us "members" if it was fine the way it was before? to be honest it feels as though members and admins are just not cooperating anymore instead we are getting more and more apart from each other.Gotouda Aki wrote:5: We didn't update anything here, we just bumped the way it used to be. It was a method that has always been supposed to be followed, but forgotten over the years. So we didn't update anything, we just reminded everyone of how it should be done.
You and Leon are the only admins that is "fairly" active these days, apart from the admins that are coding and handling stuff in the background (I hope?) So I don't see why admins don't have an minimum requirement amount of hours per month too, it's not like you are different human beings than us we all got real life too. And also it's give and take respect back you can't expect respect from the member team only and get nothing/ less back from the admin team, I'm getting more complaints about admins not responding back to our members so I think it's best to stop pointing fingers to the member every damn time and to take a look in the mirror as you are no different than us.Gotouda Aki wrote:2: This position was made because of lack of presence from the admin team. We're not fully back and I do feel like it could be a usefull position to make, but we currently lack members with enough respect, composure, activity and willingness to fill this position.
Not saying there aren't capable members, but we need all 4 points consistently. We do have 1 member we thought about giving this position, but he went inactive and only recently came back.
Fair enough.Gotouda Aki wrote:I can't say much to things build up. I try to solve issues when they come and give feedback once they've been discussed and done.
To the second point. The moderating style wasn't working. I've had several complaints about players being unfairly treated and when then looking into it, there's no proof behind those decisions. And other than that, the ban tool was overused. It's not supposed to be used as much as it was and overall the style has just become much more "use powers" instead of "teaching players".
And members complain that there's not enough reports coming from members and 1 of those reasons is because everytime an issue comes up, it's either kick, slay, ban without any proof. Meaning members punish players without taking proof, so they cannot report them and then complain if the players doesn't get striked.
I was not talking about respect between admin and member. I'm talking about overall respect member to member.
In terms of activity, yes we should be more active in-game. But a huge majority of our work is forum based, so our work constantly draws us to the forum, while a members job draws them in-game.
Of course a lot of you are active on the forum and do a lot of work there. But the difference is still great.
It's not ideal, not at all. But we have to consider the tasks given. Which is why the most of a members job is in-game and the most of an admins job is on the forum.
And I'm not trying to be all defensive towards the admins. A lot seem to forget, that I think most of us admins used to be members too and when I was a member I was like "Come on admins, wtf? Be more active in-game, this is bullshit". But then I got admin and I was like "Okay, now I get why your activity is so low". Simply because of the amount of work that gets loaded on you every time you open up Steam, Discord and especially the forum.
In another thread you were deciding to take firmer actions towardsGotouda Aki wrote:I can't say much to things build up. I try to solve issues when they come and give feedback once they've been discussed and done.
To the second point. The moderating style wasn't working. I've had several complaints about players being unfairly treated and when then looking into it, there's no proof behind those decisions. And other than that, the ban tool was overused. It's not supposed to be used as much as it was and overall the style has just become much more "use powers" instead of "teaching players".
but now you are saying members are being too heavy-handed. That's a bit of a contradiction isn't it ? You are basically saying members shouldn't moderate your friends while you yourself destroy people you dislike just like a dictator. Not to mention you are a massive hypocrite silencing people who criticize you for no reason at all once again just like a freaking dictator.You lot (the trollers and troublemakers of this community)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests