Yayy he is allive

[vote no lynch] for now.
Make my vote later too if i read all (again).

Wait no, lets try that

[vote Maki]

I'd love to hear it.



what changed your mind this time ?

It's so hard to produce decent responses to all the crap being flung around. You guys are too active.

@SiX - We vote AFKs because the worst possible situation for the village is if it becomes a viable strategy for the mafia to afk. If the mafia are ever, ever allowed to afk without a strong risk of lynch, we will lose the opportunity to catch mistakes they make in the activity they would have had. Thus, I propose that it is beneficial to lynch AFKs in general when no other interesting opportunity arises (such as is the case in most games R1). I am not trying to attack Kontra for suddenly voting an AFK after saying he wouldn't, I'm just upset with him for maintaining that AFK players should not be voted in general. The rest of you can do as you will; I'm actually LESS inclined to vote Kontra now because I don't want to punish a positive change in his behavior.

@Kontra - See above. Voting AFKs is usually good during the early rounds of the game. Just don't vote off brand new players, in my humble opinion.

@Ultor - Give it a rest. You sound like a broken record. You've made it painfully clear that you want people to reply and that you'll suspect those who don't; let them choose if they want to incur your suspicion.

@Numble - Just because the two of us didn't go out on a witch hunt doesn't mean we're not mafia. The converse is, of course, true: if one of us had gone on a witch hunt for the other, we'd likely be mafia. Perhaps if we'd lynched a mafia we would have a leg to stand on there, but I don't think you can go around proclaiming your innocence just yet.


I am actually more interested in hearing from Wayward some. I was impressed with his play in past games, but he's been oddly quiet this game. I'll toss a vote his way since I don't really care for either of the current wagons. Probably won't cause anything, but I can at least apply some pressure so he knows I have my eye on him.

[vote wayward]

Aaaaand while I'm typing and cross referencing everything, he posts. Great. I'll go do some reading and probably make a new vote in a bit here.

ronbo pls

I think you're just used to the constant afking that used to define nD. This is the way it should have been before, tbh.

I'm actually quite pleased about activity this game. I've really only had to bug a couple people to be active this round, and they both have made posts.

In fact, every living player has made at least 1 post each round this game. I think that's a nD record for activity. Most of the time there have been at least a couple people not posting each round, but this game has been pretty on point.

Keep it up, people.


plus ther's so many arguments and debates and drama going on it's very entertaining to watch

They were the first two online (on steam) people for us to bug. Emz was gonna be next if we needed him.



Also, I'm going back to SiX for previously stated illogical posts. I realize I haven't directly responded to him as much, so there isn't a decent record of what I dislike. I'll try to go back and make something soonish.

[vote Six]

There are more, sensible reasons to lynch you or NumBle (which was my prefered target but none voted against him...) rather than Kontra, for now. Also NumBle seems pretty pissed about my post, did I hit the right spot?

Since I still don't have a lot of info, [vote Emziek] - what do you think?

Re: K0ntRa vs AFKs (Part 2)


Re: ARSENIC vs Everyone


Re: K0ntRa vs Death


PS:

Kontras flipflopping on the afk issue was weird and out of place in a game where pretty much everyone is active. [vote Kontra] (unknown target)

My hero! DD

You're forgetting I was hospitalized at the time.

Oh yeah. I knew there was a good reason we didn't bug you...

Oops

[vote K0ntRa] (unknown target)

Charging up that vote savant now, are we?