POLICY-LYNCHING INACTIVES

User avatar
Mati
Posts: 4389
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:00 am
Location: Austria
Has thanked: 149 times
Been thanked: 157 times

Re: POLICY-LYNCHING INACTIVES

Post by Mati »

Bump and *sign*.
lol
Maki
Friend of the Community
Posts: 4410
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 7:57 pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 53 times

Re: POLICY-LYNCHING INACTIVES

Post by Maki »

Policy lynching is bad and you should feel bad.

noseriously, dun do it, it's often horrible. Almost as horrible as lynching me R1 nonstop like you used to do.
Image
User avatar
Mati
Posts: 4389
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:00 am
Location: Austria
Has thanked: 149 times
Been thanked: 157 times

Re: POLICY-LYNCHING INACTIVES

Post by Mati »

Nope, it can be good with a proper reasoning. Someone inactive doesn't really help the game, and someone who trolls around often as well.
lol
User avatar
Rainboy
Posts: 1923
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 4:38 pm
Location: Somewhere Over the Rainboy
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 42 times

Re: POLICY-LYNCHING INACTIVES

Post by Rainboy »

Maki wrote:Policy lynching is bad and you should feel bad.

noseriously, dun do it, it's often horrible. Almost as horrible as lynching me R1 nonstop like you used to do.
It's bad in the short term but, if done correctly, good in the long term. It's a mechanic for altering the culture of a group of players, hopefully for the better (and in this case I think it is for the better).
Sense? What fun is there in making sense...?
User avatar
Shadi
neonDragon Amdin
Posts: 15337
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:44 am
Location: Behind yo house
Been thanked: 628 times

Re: POLICY-LYNCHING INACTIVES

Post by Shadi »

Rainboy wrote:
Maki wrote:Policy lynching is bad and you should feel bad.

noseriously, dun do it, it's often horrible. Almost as horrible as lynching me R1 nonstop like you used to do.
It's bad in the short term but, if done correctly, good in the long term. It's a mechanic for altering the culture of a group of players, hopefully for the better (and in this case I think it is for the better).
No
To be humble to superiors is duty, to equals is courtesy, to inferiors is nobility.

- Benjamin Franklin
User avatar
Toon
Posts: 1747
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 7:51 pm
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 44 times

Re: POLICY-LYNCHING INACTIVES

Post by Toon »

Shadi wrote:
Rainboy wrote:
Maki wrote:Policy lynching is bad and you should feel bad.

noseriously, dun do it, it's often horrible. Almost as horrible as lynching me R1 nonstop like you used to do.
It's bad in the short term but, if done correctly, good in the long term. It's a mechanic for altering the culture of a group of players, hopefully for the better (and in this case I think it is for the better).
No
yes
Spoiler!
ImageImage
ImageImage
nice members
Veghan
Posts: 1740
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2011 4:28 pm
Location: Belgium
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 39 times

Re: POLICY-LYNCHING INACTIVES

Post by Veghan »

Yeh count me in, otherwise you get so many rounds like the nation game.There is no point in playing a game with afks.. Its like playing against bots.. You easly won lolz.
Image
Maki
Friend of the Community
Posts: 4410
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 7:57 pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 53 times

Re: POLICY-LYNCHING INACTIVES

Post by Maki »

Fire Nation is long sure but not due to inactivity.
Image
User avatar
Blaze
Posts: 4686
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 1:50 pm
Location: In Your Toilet
Has thanked: 103 times
Been thanked: 43 times

Re: POLICY-LYNCHING INACTIVES

Post by Blaze »

I sign up for the role as a host!

I'm very prepeared for this Magestisc test!
Image
User avatar
Shadi
neonDragon Amdin
Posts: 15337
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:44 am
Location: Behind yo house
Been thanked: 628 times

Re: POLICY-LYNCHING INACTIVES

Post by Shadi »

Esp with role reveal this idea ain't good, we get a most likely to be villager killed and since he's inactive we have no idea about his possible relations. Only reason to lynch an inactive is if every active is acting completely suspicion free and this hasn't often at all.
To be humble to superiors is duty, to equals is courtesy, to inferiors is nobility.

- Benjamin Franklin
User avatar
HATER
Posts: 2293
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 4:20 pm
Location: Behind you.
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 70 times
Contact:

Re: POLICY-LYNCHING INACTIVES

Post by HATER »

a) First post: Wed Mar 13, 2013 10:07 pm

Roughly about when I started playing LoL. Nice gravedig, guys.

b) However, gravedig or not, the point still stands. See Rainboy's post above.

As for Shadi, you DO realize that the purpose of this strategy is not to directly catch wolves by lynching inactives (because the inactives are most of the time villagers anyways). The purpose is to catch wolves (and make the game more active and fun) by forcing active, forthcoming play, where people talk to each other a lot and conduct their own detective work instead of waiting in the background hoping for someone else to do it. If wolves are forced out into the open and they're kept constantly on their toes having to talk and discuss, they're more likely to make mistakes.
You must disregard the statement I am currently making because every statement I make is inherently false.

ImageImage
User avatar
Shadi
neonDragon Amdin
Posts: 15337
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:44 am
Location: Behind yo house
Been thanked: 628 times

Re: POLICY-LYNCHING INACTIVES

Post by Shadi »

HATER wrote:a) First post: Wed Mar 13, 2013 10:07 pm

Roughly about when I started playing LoL. Nice gravedig, guys.

b) However, gravedig or not, the point still stands. See Rainboy's post above.

As for Shadi, you DO realize that the purpose of this strategy is not to directly catch wolves by lynching inactives (because the inactives are most of the time villagers anyways). The purpose is to catch wolves (and make the game more active and fun) by forcing active, forthcoming play, where people talk to each other a lot and conduct their own detective work instead of waiting in the background hoping for someone else to do it. If wolves are forced out into the open and they're kept constantly on their toes having to talk and discuss, they're more likely to make mistakes.
Policy lynching is the worst thing that could ever be introduced, so basically you want to lynch villagers? Some people will always do the minimal, make that minimal higher and done.

I like more activity but I don't want to force it through stupid methods.
To be humble to superiors is duty, to equals is courtesy, to inferiors is nobility.

- Benjamin Franklin
User avatar
HATER
Posts: 2293
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 4:20 pm
Location: Behind you.
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 70 times
Contact:

Re: POLICY-LYNCHING INACTIVES

Post by HATER »

Shadi wrote:
Policy lynching is the worst thing that could ever be introduced, so basically you want to lynch villagers?

So you hate the idea simply because it's a policy-lynch?

I guess you could say you're policy hating policy lynching...

Tbh I think the worst thing that could be introduced would be the child fathered by justin beiber and maki, but to each his own...
You must disregard the statement I am currently making because every statement I make is inherently false.

ImageImage
User avatar
Shadi
neonDragon Amdin
Posts: 15337
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:44 am
Location: Behind yo house
Been thanked: 628 times

Re: POLICY-LYNCHING INACTIVES

Post by Shadi »

HATER wrote:
Shadi wrote:
Policy lynching is the worst thing that could ever be introduced, so basically you want to lynch villagers?

So you hate the idea simply because it's a policy-lynch?

I guess you could say you're policy hating policy lynching...

Tbh I think the worst thing that could be introduced would be the child fathered by justin beiber and maki, but to each his own...
Yes, I don't see why "bad roleplay" should be killed with "bad roleplay".
To be humble to superiors is duty, to equals is courtesy, to inferiors is nobility.

- Benjamin Franklin
Maki
Friend of the Community
Posts: 4410
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 7:57 pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 53 times

Re: POLICY-LYNCHING INACTIVES

Post by Maki »

HATER wrote:
Shadi wrote:
Policy lynching is the worst thing that could ever be introduced, so basically you want to lynch villagers?

So you hate the idea simply because it's a policy-lynch?

I guess you could say you're policy hating policy lynching...

Tbh I think the worst thing that could be introduced would be the child fathered by justin beiber and maki, but to each his own...
hater why do you flame me all day long, I understand I told you I was not interested in a relationship with you and I'd rather be with Justin bieber but pls stop.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Community Discussion”